Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Advice on equipment?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered Users Warren_L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iDiveChick View Post
    Hi Everyone,

    I am thinking of getting into underwater photography but want to do it right. ("DIR?" lol.)

    I am leaning in the direction of a Nikon D200 because it seems to be the best value for the $1500 price without lens. I know Canon makes some really good equipment with a higher megapixel count, but they're a fortune.

    As to lenses, can any one make recommendations? I like macro, but is there a lens that can do both macro and decent wide angle shots?

    How about housings? I see some of these housings that have flip down macro with real high magnification powers.
    The D200 is a nice setup - that's my primary setup. I have also a D70, which is also a great setup. D200 allows me a bit more latitude in cropping with the slightly higher resolution.

    Remember also that megapixel count is definitely not the be-all or end-all of looking for a good camera. I think sometimes people focus a little too much on megapixels - but it is a major marketing point, though. Remember to double your resolution you need 4 times the number of megapixels, so the difference between an 8 mpix and 10 mpix camera from a resolution standpoint is negligible. I'd rather have better dynamic range than a few more megapixels.

    There are a number of great housings available. Ikelite makes a great housing for the D200 - I have an Ike housing for my D70. I went with the Aquatica housing for the D200 - one of the reasons was that it was the only one I found that was rated to 300 ft. Plus it was nicely designed too .

    For lenses, I would say the 60mm micro would be a good first macro lens, like Mike mentions. The 12-24mm is a decent wide zoom, affording some flexibility in the focal length. With a mid-range zoom I tend to think you do tend to sacrifice something to "have it all", ironically. Not that it's necessarily bad, but my personal preference is to go with a specific lens for a specific job.

  2. #2
    Registered Users Sarah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,398

    Default

    That banded coral shrimp photo on your website was really nice! What lens did you use?

  3. #3
    Registered Users Warren_L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iDiveChick View Post
    That banded coral shrimp photo on yoru website was really nice! What lens did you use?
    Thanks. That was the one in Roatan last January. It was with the Nikkor 60mm micro (macro lens) on my Ike/D70 setup.

  4. #4
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Great work Warren - how much after processing do you do and what do you use Photoshop, etc?

  5. #5

    Default

    D200 is a great camera, I'm waiting for my sea&sea housing for my d200. Currently I use F5 and d70, all with sea&sea housing. Most housing manufacturer make the underwater housing for d200. I use 4 main lenses for my work, 10,5mm and 12-24mm for wide angle (17-35mm for F5), 60mm macro and 105mm for macro. All the housing are equiped with their corresponding port for each lenses. I use YS 350 for the wide angle shooting..it's a monster, and dual ys 30 for macro. Any one has any experience with inon z240?

    to see the result of the d70, http://ciptoag.multiply.com

  6. #6
    Registered Users Sarah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,398

    Default

    Chip, your photo here is gorgeous! The baby lionfish is cute too!

    You can upload any photos you have into the Gallery here if you wish and they will randomly appear on the front page under "Random Images".



  7. #7
    Banned
    Country
    St. vincent and the Grenadines
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default UW Photography....

    As a dive shop owner I have seen lots of different set ups.... I would liken owning your first UW camera to owning your first car. Would you recommend a newly qualified driver to buy a Porsche?

    I started UW photography with a very basic setup, and flooded the damn thing on it's first outing! It was an expensive camera with an inexpensive housing!

    I then did some home work and decided on the Sea and Sea DX8000. This camera and housing has subsequently been discontinued, but the replacement is still a great all round camera / housing. (The new one offers 10 mega pixels - the picture quality is great!). All of the pictures on my web site indigodive.com and in my galleries were taken with this camera.

    The camera has an automatic setting, so that you can get some great shots pretty much as soon as you get started, and it has a manual mode so that you can play with F stops, white balance so on and so forth.

    The other thing that I like with the camera is that it is small enough to fit in your pocket when you are top side, and still takes great shots.

    The housing is compact enough that you travel with it in your hand luggage, and you access to all the functionality of the housing when you are underwater.

    The DX8000 can take great macro shots, and it also has a wet lens that you can slide on during the dive to take wide angle shots - which you can't do with the larger SLR housings.

    My only frustration with this camera is the cycle time between shots when using the flash - but digital technology will rectify this over time I guess!

    Lastly, the DX8000 set up also has a very handy video capability - very handy when you see something that just will only work as a moving picture!

    By the way - I am not a Sea and Sea employee - just really like base model cameras. I have been using mine for about 18 months now, and my original set up has about 700 dives. I am now ready to move on to something a little more sophisticated, so am trying to get my husband to agree that I should be allowed to spend a few grand on my new set-up!

    The new Sea and Sea camera (10 mega pixel) with housing and flash will cost approx US$1000 give or take - or you can buy the camera and housing and buy accessories via fantasea.com - they make some really good stuff and the prices and very reasonable. I especially like their LED lights.

    Hope that this helps.

    Kay Wilson,
    Indigo Dive,
    St. Vincent.

  8. #8
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Personally, I wouldn't take a D200 underwater unless you have had years of underwater photography experience. It's the cost, the equipment and the challenge of handling complex dslr equipments under water, etc etc that makes it really challenging and if it's a D200 setup, chance of loosing that setup because of flooding is very high due to being a beginer.

    Having said that, a good point and shoot with an excellent single strobe (like an Inon or Ikelite) might be a choice of learning underwater photography. They can take outstanding quality pictures.

    I have recently switched to shoot dSLR after my beloved Olympus C5050 point and shoot and so far I have achived no pictures from my Nikon D80 that is any better then shot with the Olympus. I think by the end of this year, things should change but meanwhile, it's a learning curve.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •