Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Which Camcorder?

  1. #11
    Registered Users
    State
    Suffering from Nitrogen Withdrawal
    Country
    Canada
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    313

    Default

    This weekend's Boston Sea Rovers showed a film by Jill Heinerth that she filmed in remote Russian underwater caves using an Xacti. She did joke about quality and "graininess" but it was all she could bring due to luggage restrictions.

    The excerpts from her film were excellent - mainly because it's more about skill, perspective & presentation than it is about the camera. This was an excellent example of making full use of what you've got & requires more care & skill. & often, the results are better than with a high-end $$$$ that you don't know how to fully use properly

    If the xacti is within your budget and is the perfect size then get it The best camera/video is always the one you have handy when you want to shoot.

  2. #12
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5

    Angry

    Hi Everyone,

    Thanks for taking the time to read and post replies on here. Still doing the homework but we have a holiday to Maldives coming up at the end of June & I'd like to have something to take with me. Budget would be up to GBP 1,200 for both camera and housing. Main features I'm looking for would be compact size and ease of use for someone who knows ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, ZERO, ZIP about taking stills or movies underwater. Nothing too complicated or is that too much to ask for?!!!

    Don't want broadcast quality but I would be disappointed with something which gave results not 'worth watching' which is what I got from the Fujifilm f50hd I bought just before our last holiday. Stills were VERY grainy if viewed any larger than 4" x 5" (but that might be operator error ) and it's not possible to white balance in movie mode so movies don't have good colour.

    Thanks again for your time.

    Little Jem

  3. #13
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little Jem View Post
    Hi Everyone,

    Thanks for taking the time to read and post replies on here. Budget would be up to GBP 1,200 for both camera and housing. Main features I'm looking for would be compact size and ease of use for someone who knows ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, ZERO, ZIP about taking stills or movies underwater. Nothing too complicated or is that too much to ask for?!!!

    Don't want broadcast quality but I would be disappointed with something which gave results not 'worth watching' ... and it's not possible to white balance in movie mode so movies don't have good colour.

    Little Jem
    Hi,

    I'm on hold so was browsing and saw your post. So this may be really long depending on how well my celphone cust. service actually is.

    Now to really confuse things. (hopefully not...LOL)

    The FX1/A1U previous suggestion is well out of your budget. The cameras sell for between $2500-3500 U.S. and the housings will be another $2-8K depending on manufacturer and port options. The least expensive FX1/housing I've seen is $5199 with an Equinox housing.

    My personal opinion is that you should also get an HD model. Even if you don't currently own an HDTV, the quality is so much better and most (all?) HDV camcorders also output a down-converted SD signal. IMO it's a better quality image than all but the best 3-chip non HD cameras produce. It should be, the video is being captured at about 4x greater resolution.

    Not sure how things are there, but broadcast is going digital here next February and I really don't know many people who don't have at least one HDTV now.

    1200GBP is roughly $2400 US so here's some options in that range, not sure about what VAT and all that does to your price. Plus at least here in the US PAL format camcorders are slightly higher. What is the television standard there? PAL or NTSC? Most housings work with either format.

    I've no experience with the Xacti so no comment about it other than it seems kind of limited. But for the price it may do all you want.

    The first consideration is housing type, mechanical vs. electronic. Both have their benefits.

    Electronics are plug in, seal and go but they require the purchase of certain Sony cameras - only those models equipped with LANC jacks. (all the higher priced ones of course...LOL)

    Mechanical housings house other camera mfr's. models but they are usually camera specific so future upgrades typically require a re-fit or re-purchase of a new housing. Another point to consider about a mech. housing is that the controls are located near the function they control so you'll have to move your hands around the housing during filming. Electronic controls are typically on the handles so all functions are within reach without having to look for them. (but there's exceptions to that also)

    Another option is do you want a tape or HDD (Hard disk drive) camera. The HDD models store a lot more footage but once full the footage has to be downloaded somewhere. Tapes can just be changed after an hour's footage is shot.

    There's a further difference in that tape is stored as HDV vs. HDD models that use AVCHD compression, both work well but AVCHD currently requires more computing power for editing. Both need to be burned to DVD to be played other than on the camera.

    Jon's suggestion of the HV-20 was a good one but his estimate of the cost was a bit high. B&H Photo Video in NYC bundles it in a package for $1800US.
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...using_Kit.html The HV-20 was camcorderinfo.com's camcorder of the year last year.

    Should you want a HDD version, they bundle the Canon HG10 with an Ikelite housing for $1689. I just bought this camera for my sister of all the current HDD models it seemed to have the best feature set for the price ($660).
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...ter_Video.html

    Nice thing about Ikelite housings is that they're essentially bulletproof. Also the handles remove for easy transport in a carry-on. Downside is that their viewing options are limited to either the viewfinder or a side mirror option they sell for some models. However the mirror option pans backwards on anything but certain Sony housings that have their correction circuitry installed.

    For electronic housings your're limited to certain Sony camcorders. Here in the states they're a little higher priced than similar models from Canon, JVC etc. so housing options within your budget will have some limitations. Typically it will be a lesser depth rating or limited control set.

    Ocean Images sells their HC-series housing for $1295 base price, with an add-on MWB control ($200). Add the HDR-HC5 ($700) and you're just under budget.

    Another option is the new Top Dawg Standard housing with 3.5" LCD monitor back. The trade-off is that NO MWB is possible with this housing. But at it's price ($1300) you almost could buy a Sony HDR-HC7/9 ($969/999) or the new HDR-SR10 HDD model ($799 on sale at B&H) It's also the housing that I mentioned earlier that's the exception to the controls on handles rule, there's are mounted on both sides of the housing near the handles.

    You can also get the TopDawg without monitor for $900 but the view through the back port is slightly obstructed. I know two people who've done that then added a small monitor soon afterwards.

    Another option would be to get a SD resolution camera - any # of Sony's, Canon's JVC's etc. for less money and then find a housing from Ikelite or Equinox for around $8-900US. Could easily put something together sub $1500 or less. Personally I wouldn't though as image quality seems to be a concern of yours.

    gotta go, I'm finally talking to a real person - only 22 minutes later.

    PM with other questions, I'm not often on this forum.

  4. #14
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Left out a couple links:

    Ocean Images HC-series housing: http://www.oceanimagesinc.com/produc...s_housings.htm

    Top Dawg w/LCD back:
    http://reefphoto.com/index.php?main_...163fa42584fb3f

  5. #15
    Registered Users
    City
    Sydney
    State
    NSW
    Country
    Australia
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    103

    Default

    Yeah sorry just found out that the HV 20 is a heaps less everywhere else other than Australia. Same with Ike housings too.

    Love living in Oz but there are definately disadvantages!

  6. #16

    Default

    I would love to see some underwater footage from the Xacti. I wonder if it would compare to my sony hc3/Top Dawg setup?

    I used my sony cybershot 10 megapixel camera w/ 8gig card for video before and it worked well.. (with a blue cast on everything).

    here is the footage.

    cheers.. Russell

    YouTube - Diving in the Philippines.

  7. #17
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Hi Publisher,

    What housing do you use with the FX1?

  8. #18
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Hi All,

    Still wrestling with this decision. I used to be indecisive but don't know if I am or not now!!!!

    Maldives holiday rapidly approaching and not really sure where to go to get some good advice and get my hands on some of the camcorders to get a 'feel' for which might be best. Here in the UK there seems to be only 1 retail outlet dedicated to underwater photo/video and that's in London which is quite a long drive for us.

    And the camera shops can only comment on camera/camcorder performance in normal above water conditions and have no experience of underwater performance.

    I'll check out the canon HV20 though and let you know any 'developments'.

    Thanks for your comments.

    Little Jem

  9. #19
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14

  10. #20
    SMN Publisher The Publisher's Avatar
    Country
    USA
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,231

    Default

    I use the Amphibico Phenom housing and an external Amphibico 16:9 HD monitor not shown in my avatar photo an dual HID lights.

    I also have a Sherpa on retainer to carry the entire thing when we can't get a crane to the dive site.

    The entire camera setup is more expensive than the Sherpa.

    To the rest of you guys, you're sportin some really good advice, thanks for adding your considerable expertise.
    SMN Publisher

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •