PDA

View Full Version : Government Caught Red-Handed Passing Around Passenger Backscatter Nude Pics



The Publisher
03-15-2010, 05:39 PM
Remember all the psychobabble pablum about how the government said that passengers who are forced to have nude pics taken of them would have their privacy rights protected? Is that sort of like being anti-rape while raping someone?

Well, now the government has been caught red handed printing out nude photos of passengers that had gone through backscatter/millimeter wavelength imaging devices, and worse passing them around.

So much for their lies that images cannot be stored nor made.

"Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem."-Ronald Reagan

Claims on behalf of authorities that naked body scanner images are immediately destroyed after passengers pass through new x-ray backscatter devices have been proven fraudulent after it was revealed that naked images of Indian film star Shahrukh Khan were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London.

See Below Article:

UK Transport Secretary Lord Adonis said last week that the images produced by the scanners were deleted “immediately” and airport staff carrying out the procedure are fully trained and supervised.

“It is very important to stress that the images which are captured by body scanners are immediately deleted after the passenger has gone through the body scanner,” Adonis told the London Evening Standard.

Adonis was forced to address privacy concerns following reports that the images produced by the scanners broke child pornography laws in the UK. When the scanners were first introduced, it was also speculated that images of famous people would be ripe for abuse as the pictures produced by the devices make genitals “eerily visible” according to journalists who have investigated trials of the technology.

However, the Transport Secretary’s assurances were demolished after it was revealed on the BBC’s Jonathan Ross show Friday that Indian actor Shahrukh Khan had passed through a body scan and later had the image of his naked body printed out and circulated by Heathrow security staff.

“I was in London recently going through the airport and these new machines have come up, the body scans. You’ve got to see them. It makes you embarrassed – if you’re not well endowed,” said Khan, referring to how the scans produce clear images of a person’s genitals.

“You walk into the machine and everything – the whole outline of your body – comes out,” he said.

“I was a little scared. Something happens [inside the scans], and I came out. Then I saw these girls – they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said ‘give them to me’ – and you could see everything inside. So I autographed them for them,” stated Khan.

The story was carried by Yahoo News under the headline “Shah Rukh signs off sexy body-scan printouts at Heathrow”.

Khan’s reference to “girls” with printouts of his naked body scan can only refer to female airport security staff responsible for processing the images produced by the scanners, “professionals” who are supposed to instantly delete the images, according to Lord Adonis.

The revelation that airport security staff are completely abusing any notion of the professionalism promised by authorities by printing out and circulating images of naked body scans should set alarm bells ringing, especially in light of the fact that such images of minors break child pornography laws. British authorities have made it mandatory for travelers to submit to the naked body scanners when asked and have overturned previous rules that prevented under 18’s from passing through the devices.

Within days of the devices being introduced at Heathrow, staff have abused their professionalism and printed out naked scans of a famous actor for their own titillation.

We were promised all along that the body scanners “increased privacy” because they were only accessible to a single staff member who had no personal contact with the passenger taking the scan, in addition to the assurance that the images could not be saved and were instantly deleted. It in fact turns out that airport staff have been saving, printing and circulating naked body scans in complete violation of these supposed guarantees.

Furthermore, we were told that the identity of the person undergoing the virtual strip search would also be kept private. The fact that Heathrow employees must have known that the actor was about to take the body scan in order to print out copies of the image also proves this claim to be a total fallacy.

The abuse of the naked body scan images in this instance is a total violation of every data protection law in the UK. Far from treating the story in a comical manner, Khan should be filing a very expensive lawsuit and preparing for a successful and lucrative outcome.

In the meantime, the revelation that the naked body scanner images are being freely printed out and circulated by airport security staff should prove to be the death knell for plans on behalf of governments worldwide to institute the scanners on a widespread basis.


source: Prison Planet

greenturtle
03-15-2010, 11:56 PM
That sucks! (the printing of people's body images)
There should not be any device to store images or a SW that automatically delete the images after a day or a time period.

acelockco
03-17-2010, 02:05 AM
There should not be any device to store images or a SW that automatically delete the images after a day or a time period.

No, they just should ban the device and it's use. Either that, or maybe just do away with the TSA completely. They don't know how to do their jobs, and now they are abusing their power. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

I WILL REFUSE TO GO THROUGH A BODY SCANNER!!!

The Publisher
03-17-2010, 05:40 AM
Straight from the TSA website under What Are My Options (http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/imaging_technology.shtm)

"Advanced imaging technology screening is optional for all passengers".

Just like they say to throw a frog into a pot of cold water then slowly turn on the heat, or how they got laws allowing them to collect only $25 from you if talking on your cellphone while driving, and the fine is now $185, it is just a matter of time before they remove the optional part.

acelockco
03-19-2010, 01:48 AM
Only a matter of time before I leave this country and try to live a little different type of life. This is starting to remind me of something that happened in Germany years ago.

The Publisher
03-19-2010, 02:23 AM
If you get a retirement or pension payment of $1000 a month, you can love like a KING in the Philippines.

acelockco
03-22-2010, 10:56 PM
That sounds like it could be really good. As long as the diving is as great as I think it is, then I could be pretty happy.